The Forecaster – the World v USA
It is incredible the stark difference between the United States even allowing the movie to show and just about everywhere outside the USA. The NY banks control the courts, Congress, and the press – the American Oligarchy. Even the theater in Princeton has refused to show the movie where my family would have liked to attend a debut. In Germany, there is hardly a city it will not be shown in. They are showing this film in universities outside the USA and it was funny to see ratings from Europe at a 10 and USA at a 1. Talk about protecting the banks.
Some new evidence has just been discovered which we will post on this site. This should really open a number of people’s eyes, but bet not until the economy turns down after 2015.75.
Nevertheless, there will be a viewing via a live stream from Europe that the producers will be doing. I suppose this will be sort of likeRadio Free America in reverse given the strong resistance here by the American Oligarchy and the constant protecting the NY moneycenter banks to the destruction of everyone’s future. Just another example how America is no different from North Korea. If they do not want you to see a movie, they pull the same shit.
We will post their link when it is up or you can visit their website.
What is Money & Are Future Contracts Immoral?
COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong,
Even though you don’t usually post comments from people that you perceive as “critical” of some of your views, as well as those who try to correct you when you do make errors (we’re all human, not perfect), I still feel compelled to point out some things on several issues you’ve written about recently:
1. “Money” that’s “created out of thin air”, for starters, is a contradiction in terms in and of itself. If it’s money, it must have intrinsic value, otherwise it lends itself to fraud – and the ultimate fraudulent instrument is electronic so-called “currency” created and controlled by a handful of private individuals that don’t represent the interests of the public.
REPLY: I have addressed this topic and others along these lines many times. At the Solution Conference I went over our entire problem stems from the fact that we are not examining what is truly money and your comment that it must be intrinsic is what prevents us from advancing. What you describe is a barter system – I will give you this for that. This is trapping us in the stone age.
Other negative comments have said future contracts are selling something you do not yet have is immoral. I do not know where this idea comes from but if I paid you to work yet I pay you in advance, isn’t that the same as a future contract? If you work for the week, then you are assuming I am good for the money and will honor your labor paying when finished. To eliminate futures becomes impossible. Do I pay you on a minute by minute basis? Even then, do I pay you in advance or after each minute?
Money is the total productive capacity of a person and the combination with all the people builds the wealth of a nation. China rose from Communism NOT because they had gold, it was because of their people. Japan had no natural resources to speak of nor gold and they too rose from the ashes to the second largest economy. This proves Adam Smith was correct – money is not gold, it is the capacity to produce and that is the Invisible Hand. All I can say is watch the Solution Conference, because until you grasp this concept, you cannot move forward.
Are you a worthless individual incapable of supporting anyone because you do not have some tangible form of money? Hard work means nothing then.
Questioning Cycles
QUESTION:
Mr. Armstrong, thank you for all the educating of the masses that you are doing, I have a question about one of the charts in your article of April 8 titled “The ECM and the Interaction of a Complex Wave Structure” you show a series of charts, the chart of “Grate Lakes Annual Maximum Ice Coverage 1973-2014″ looks like random occurrence to me, if this is wrong could you explain how your model would be able to project lets say the 2015 winter ice coverage in the Great Lakes, this chart doesn’t seem to follow any know cycle or Pi.
Thank you in advance for your insight.
NM
ANSWER: There are many dimensions to cycles. You have turning points and you have the building in volatility creating different amplitude in waves – Phase Transitions. It was Lorenz for fed a huge swath of weather data into a computer and what came out was a hidden order from what appeared to be chaos.
This was the birth of Chaos Theory. It is complex and not always easily seen by the naked eye. This has been revealed with the computer for only there can you see the patterns emerge from what would seem to be just random noise.
Your problem is common. People assume cycles are simply constant wave formations like the Transverse Wave and if they do not see that they assume it is bullshit. Then there are cycles that repeat patterns over great lengths and cannot be seen trying to measure a Transverse formation from one peak to the next peak and conclude this is nonsense.
Now the complexity really builds for what enters the equation is the Superposition Principle. Now you have many cycles impacting others from different instruments or data sources and just when you thought a high should unfold, sorry, you get a low. This is why I call these targets TURNING POINTS because there can be the Phase Transition creating the bubble tops (Constructive Inference) and Cycle Inversions (Destructive Inference).
I just hired a in house editor because we have so many books to get out and no time to do this. I am running around in so many directions and it will get far worse after 2015.75. So we will try to start getting these books out and this is is part of the subject behind the Geometry of Time.
No comments:
Post a Comment