From a comment on this article:
The Scam of the Legal System
The
"legal system" is nothing other than a huge scam, fraud,
artifice, which is set up solely for the impoverishment and control
of its victims. And of course, it also has the intent of using any
means at all at its disposal for keeping itself going on forever, and
growing, at an ever increasing rate.
"legal system" is nothing other than a huge scam, fraud,
artifice, which is set up solely for the impoverishment and control
of its victims. And of course, it also has the intent of using any
means at all at its disposal for keeping itself going on forever, and
growing, at an ever increasing rate.
But
fear not, Dear Reader, as there is a most simple way out of that
abyss, that labyrinth which we have been led into under the false
idea that we can hire someone to help us in obtaining our justice
when we are wronged. It is quite simply the serious and dedicated
application of the Three Magic Questions. They are; What is the
EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYONE has the right to commit? What is
the EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYONE has an obligation to endure?
What is the BASIC PREMISE that is being operated off of in the
instant case? No lieyer who has ever been asked those first two
questions has given a straight answer, the ONLY answer possible,
which is none. For to do so would put an immediate end to the fraud
which they depend upon for their daily bread!
fear not, Dear Reader, as there is a most simple way out of that
abyss, that labyrinth which we have been led into under the false
idea that we can hire someone to help us in obtaining our justice
when we are wronged. It is quite simply the serious and dedicated
application of the Three Magic Questions. They are; What is the
EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYONE has the right to commit? What is
the EXACT AMOUNT of fraud that ANYONE has an obligation to endure?
What is the BASIC PREMISE that is being operated off of in the
instant case? No lieyer who has ever been asked those first two
questions has given a straight answer, the ONLY answer possible,
which is none. For to do so would put an immediate end to the fraud
which they depend upon for their daily bread!
It
is a given that no one who is dependent upon something will ever do
much, if anything at all, to harm it. Hence, we see quite clearly
now as to why the lieyers of the world do not like to look too
closely at the origins of their "profession" and what has
become of it. What had started out as a bona fide alternative to the
thoroughly corrupted King's Court, has now become that very thing
which it was created in protest against; a totally corrupted system!
Many may balk at what this Author says, but NONE of them can offer up
even the slightest shred of anything to actually prove it wrong.
is a given that no one who is dependent upon something will ever do
much, if anything at all, to harm it. Hence, we see quite clearly
now as to why the lieyers of the world do not like to look too
closely at the origins of their "profession" and what has
become of it. What had started out as a bona fide alternative to the
thoroughly corrupted King's Court, has now become that very thing
which it was created in protest against; a totally corrupted system!
Many may balk at what this Author says, but NONE of them can offer up
even the slightest shred of anything to actually prove it wrong.
If
there was some amount of fraud that one had a right to commit or an
obligation to endure, then how could it possibly be measured?
Without that measuring stick or container or balance scale, how could
anyone know for certain how much was not enough or how much was too
much?
there was some amount of fraud that one had a right to commit or an
obligation to endure, then how could it possibly be measured?
Without that measuring stick or container or balance scale, how could
anyone know for certain how much was not enough or how much was too
much?
What
is the BASIC PREMISE that is being operated off of at any given time?
Don't we have the Right to know that? Aren't we at a severe
disadvantage if we do not? Who can say that we have no inherent
right to know all of what goes on around us? Are we "persons"
held as slaves to another in a democracy, or are we free men and
women in a republic? Please heed these words here well, for they ARE
the key to the chains around your ankles!
is the BASIC PREMISE that is being operated off of at any given time?
Don't we have the Right to know that? Aren't we at a severe
disadvantage if we do not? Who can say that we have no inherent
right to know all of what goes on around us? Are we "persons"
held as slaves to another in a democracy, or are we free men and
women in a republic? Please heed these words here well, for they ARE
the key to the chains around your ankles!
If
you print out the TMQs, either by hand or machine, and then post them
all around your house and at work, after a short amount of time of
thinking about them, they will become a part of your mind and way of
thinking. Every time that you are interacting with others, you will
think of it in terms of those TMQs!
you print out the TMQs, either by hand or machine, and then post them
all around your house and at work, after a short amount of time of
thinking about them, they will become a part of your mind and way of
thinking. Every time that you are interacting with others, you will
think of it in terms of those TMQs!
Look
up the definitions of fraud and contract, and learn them as well as
you know your own name. Make them such a part of your thinking that
not a day goes by without contemplating them, and you will then begin
to see a change in your life. In the way that others treat you, and
you treat others as well. It can't help but happen, unless you wish
to keep on being cheated and cheating others too.
up the definitions of fraud and contract, and learn them as well as
you know your own name. Make them such a part of your thinking that
not a day goes by without contemplating them, and you will then begin
to see a change in your life. In the way that others treat you, and
you treat others as well. It can't help but happen, unless you wish
to keep on being cheated and cheating others too.
The
entire legal system is a den of thieves and vipers. Why should we
continue to feed them anymore, when they bring us such unlimited
amounts of misery? We need to use the TMQs and starve them all out
of business as well as existence!! What would a so-called "judge"
be able to say or do if asked those three simple questions? What
could they say? What can ANYBODY say in response to them? It should
be dawning upon you Dear Reader, just about now, that you are at the
mercy of a corrupted system that has gone wild and is completely out
of control. Who is going to rein it all back in? Can it ever be
done? This Author says no, it cannot! It is like a hand or arm with
gangrene in it. It cannot be saved, so it must be cut off as quickly
as possible, before the body dies and there is nothing left to save.
entire legal system is a den of thieves and vipers. Why should we
continue to feed them anymore, when they bring us such unlimited
amounts of misery? We need to use the TMQs and starve them all out
of business as well as existence!! What would a so-called "judge"
be able to say or do if asked those three simple questions? What
could they say? What can ANYBODY say in response to them? It should
be dawning upon you Dear Reader, just about now, that you are at the
mercy of a corrupted system that has gone wild and is completely out
of control. Who is going to rein it all back in? Can it ever be
done? This Author says no, it cannot! It is like a hand or arm with
gangrene in it. It cannot be saved, so it must be cut off as quickly
as possible, before the body dies and there is nothing left to save.
Make
your OWN test of the TMQs as this Author has done. Ask as many
lieyers as you can stomach, what the answers to those questions are.
You won't get one in a thousand to answer you honestly, for it would
go straight against what they are all about! Just look up "Attorney
and Client" in the Corpus Juris Secundum, Section 14 and see it
for yourself!
your OWN test of the TMQs as this Author has done. Ask as many
lieyers as you can stomach, what the answers to those questions are.
You won't get one in a thousand to answer you honestly, for it would
go straight against what they are all about! Just look up "Attorney
and Client" in the Corpus Juris Secundum, Section 14 and see it
for yourself!
A
thorough and careful study of any law dictionary will give you more
knowledge of and insight into the criminal nature of the legal system
than you could ever imagine. It is just FILLED with expose' after
expose' of how corrupt the system is, if you are only daring enough
to see it for what it is.
thorough and careful study of any law dictionary will give you more
knowledge of and insight into the criminal nature of the legal system
than you could ever imagine. It is just FILLED with expose' after
expose' of how corrupt the system is, if you are only daring enough
to see it for what it is.
Very
few people will go into a fight that they completely KNOW they have
no chance of winning. They would rather just let the fight come to
them, and be killed, than to expend their last energy in that way.
The lieyers of the world are the same way. They know that they
cannot prevail against the TMQs, so they do all that they can to
avoid them like the plague. To answer them correctly, is to commit
suicide, both financially as well as "professionally".
Being as professional as an unwashed whore that is. What could a
lieyer do for honest work then? Surely not much until retrained, as
their whole career was all about lying, cheating and stealing. If
anyone at all can prove this Author to be wrong to any degree, in any
way, then let them do so at once! This is all born out of some facts
as solid as a piece of granite stone, coupled with a bit of logic.
True, some may like to ridicule these facts, thoughts and logic, but
can they prove them to be wrong? Or have all of the differences
between what is right and what is wrong been eliminated? If such is
the case, then surely it must have been done by the lieyers
themselves, for no one else would profit so handsomely from such a
dastardly deed as they would. But to be fair, whores at least serve
a useful, if maybe distasteful purpose in society. Lieyers on the
other hand, do not. Maggots, jackals and vultures may feed off of
dead bodies, but lieyers are the main cause of all those dead bodies.
few people will go into a fight that they completely KNOW they have
no chance of winning. They would rather just let the fight come to
them, and be killed, than to expend their last energy in that way.
The lieyers of the world are the same way. They know that they
cannot prevail against the TMQs, so they do all that they can to
avoid them like the plague. To answer them correctly, is to commit
suicide, both financially as well as "professionally".
Being as professional as an unwashed whore that is. What could a
lieyer do for honest work then? Surely not much until retrained, as
their whole career was all about lying, cheating and stealing. If
anyone at all can prove this Author to be wrong to any degree, in any
way, then let them do so at once! This is all born out of some facts
as solid as a piece of granite stone, coupled with a bit of logic.
True, some may like to ridicule these facts, thoughts and logic, but
can they prove them to be wrong? Or have all of the differences
between what is right and what is wrong been eliminated? If such is
the case, then surely it must have been done by the lieyers
themselves, for no one else would profit so handsomely from such a
dastardly deed as they would. But to be fair, whores at least serve
a useful, if maybe distasteful purpose in society. Lieyers on the
other hand, do not. Maggots, jackals and vultures may feed off of
dead bodies, but lieyers are the main cause of all those dead bodies.
These
elevated to the bench so-called "judges" (actually they're
just Executive Administrators sitting in Admiralty jurisdiction) are
just more lieyers, and are far from being unbiased. Since they do
not swear a proper oath of office, and also are members of the
British Accredidation Registry who take bribes (cash payments in
"income tax" cases and monies from civil judgments paid
into their retirement funds), how can they be anything BUT biased??
elevated to the bench so-called "judges" (actually they're
just Executive Administrators sitting in Admiralty jurisdiction) are
just more lieyers, and are far from being unbiased. Since they do
not swear a proper oath of office, and also are members of the
British Accredidation Registry who take bribes (cash payments in
"income tax" cases and monies from civil judgments paid
into their retirement funds), how can they be anything BUT biased??
Justice
must satisfy the appearance of justice. The USSC has ruled and
reaffirmed so in Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S. Ct 1038
(1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11,14, 75 S. Ct.
11,13 (1954). "A Judge receiving a bribe from an interested
party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of
justice". How much plainer than that does it need to be?? For
further proof of all this, just do a search for "Fraud upon the
Court" or "Fraud on the Court" and see what you find.
"It is axiomatic that fraud vitiates everything". Those
words are not those of this Author only, they come from many, many
court cases. ANY officers committing fraud upon the court render the
orders and judgments of that court void, of no legal force or effect.
This is the reason why everyone needs to get the "judge"
on record at the outset, BEFORE any kind of plea is entered into the
record, a promise to not commit any kind of fraud to any degree in
the proceedings nor to allow anyone else to commit any fraud either.
What kind of "judge" would not gladly make such a promise?
Would any honest judge have a valid reason for not doing so? Is
there some kind of hidden premise that is being operated off of in
the courtroom? As stated earlier, NO ONE who is benefiting from a
fraud or scam can be counted upon to injure it. The legal system has
become a plague upon the land, and like a plague, it will kill itself
off after it destroys more hosts than are needed to keep itself
going.
must satisfy the appearance of justice. The USSC has ruled and
reaffirmed so in Levine v. United States, 362 U.S. 610, 80 S. Ct 1038
(1960), citing Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11,14, 75 S. Ct.
11,13 (1954). "A Judge receiving a bribe from an interested
party over which he is presiding, does not give the appearance of
justice". How much plainer than that does it need to be?? For
further proof of all this, just do a search for "Fraud upon the
Court" or "Fraud on the Court" and see what you find.
"It is axiomatic that fraud vitiates everything". Those
words are not those of this Author only, they come from many, many
court cases. ANY officers committing fraud upon the court render the
orders and judgments of that court void, of no legal force or effect.
This is the reason why everyone needs to get the "judge"
on record at the outset, BEFORE any kind of plea is entered into the
record, a promise to not commit any kind of fraud to any degree in
the proceedings nor to allow anyone else to commit any fraud either.
What kind of "judge" would not gladly make such a promise?
Would any honest judge have a valid reason for not doing so? Is
there some kind of hidden premise that is being operated off of in
the courtroom? As stated earlier, NO ONE who is benefiting from a
fraud or scam can be counted upon to injure it. The legal system has
become a plague upon the land, and like a plague, it will kill itself
off after it destroys more hosts than are needed to keep itself
going.
No
casino anywhere in the world forces people in off the street at gun
point and makes them gamble with their life or property, so why
should a court be able to do it? What is the basic premise of the
courts? It's certainly not to ensure that justice is done! The
outcome of any so-called "trial" is no more guaranteed than
whether black or red will come up on the spin of a wheel. In the
subject of casinos, most everybody is aware to some degree that the
games are all rigged up in favor of the house, but how many of us
know that the courts are rigged up every bit as much, if not even
WORSE?
casino anywhere in the world forces people in off the street at gun
point and makes them gamble with their life or property, so why
should a court be able to do it? What is the basic premise of the
courts? It's certainly not to ensure that justice is done! The
outcome of any so-called "trial" is no more guaranteed than
whether black or red will come up on the spin of a wheel. In the
subject of casinos, most everybody is aware to some degree that the
games are all rigged up in favor of the house, but how many of us
know that the courts are rigged up every bit as much, if not even
WORSE?
In
the case of U.S. v. Robert C. Braun, Mr. Braun merely asked if the
property he and his fellows had been protesting upon had ever been
ceded to or bought by the federal government. It had not, so the
silent judicial notice of federal legislation being in full force and
effect there was negated. Braun, and his already convicted fellow
protesters (all of whom had hired attorneys BTW) against abortion had
not in fact violated the F.A.C.E. Act and were thus set free. Foley
Bros. v. Filardo had been upheld, much to the chagrin of the
prostituting attorney, who told the "judge" that if the
legislative jurisdictional challenge from Braun was permitted to
stand, "half the prison doors in America would fly open".
EXCUSE ME?!?! That filthy scum bag lieyer KNEW that fraud was being
committed all along, and yet did nothing to stop it? Why wasn't he
put into jail for aiding and abetting a crime? Or is it his JOB to
commit fraud upon everyone that he can get away with? It most
certainly does seem so!
the case of U.S. v. Robert C. Braun, Mr. Braun merely asked if the
property he and his fellows had been protesting upon had ever been
ceded to or bought by the federal government. It had not, so the
silent judicial notice of federal legislation being in full force and
effect there was negated. Braun, and his already convicted fellow
protesters (all of whom had hired attorneys BTW) against abortion had
not in fact violated the F.A.C.E. Act and were thus set free. Foley
Bros. v. Filardo had been upheld, much to the chagrin of the
prostituting attorney, who told the "judge" that if the
legislative jurisdictional challenge from Braun was permitted to
stand, "half the prison doors in America would fly open".
EXCUSE ME?!?! That filthy scum bag lieyer KNEW that fraud was being
committed all along, and yet did nothing to stop it? Why wasn't he
put into jail for aiding and abetting a crime? Or is it his JOB to
commit fraud upon everyone that he can get away with? It most
certainly does seem so!
So
woe unto YOU, lieyers of the world! The people are beginning to wake
up to your foul works and evil deeds, and soon we will be rid of you,
one way or another!
woe unto YOU, lieyers of the world! The people are beginning to wake
up to your foul works and evil deeds, and soon we will be rid of you,
one way or another!
No comments:
Post a Comment