Computer v Human Interpretation
From a human perspective, we are only capable to forecasting what we THINK is possible. The questions about knowledge and relationships are interesting but understand one thing. Nobody is capable to knowing everything. We are all human. The computer model is a fully functioning Artificial Intelligence System that learns like a child, and stores its knowledge the same as we do. The difference is simply it never gets tired and it never forgets. The world is non-linear and one person’s opinion is still an opinion subject to error.
The computer understands English and responds to questions. It is consistent. Checks everything all the time, does not get a headache nor a hangover. But most of all, it has consistently beaten human analysis for decades because it looks at the entire world. Humans naturally try to reduce everything to a single dimension whereas the computer is not prejudiced with assumed relationships but explores the world freely and returns with information that will blow your mind.
Sorry – it ain’t me.
Unemployment v Recovery
QUESTION: Can there be a recovery with rising unemployment? There seems to be some who say that is impossible.
ANSWER: This is the entire problem with analysis. There is NEVER a standard answer because the truth is far more complex. The common mistake in analysis is man’s desire to reduce everything to a single one-dimensional relationship – x up and y down. The mistake is the assumption we live in a linear world – we do not. The world is non-linear. Nothing in life is linear from weather to life. We are born and we die – everything in between is subject to interpretation.
US unemployment peaked at 25% in 1933. It declined to 14.2% for 1937, which was still way above the unemployment levels of the extreme peaks for the Panics of 1907 and 1919. There is no empirical relationship that can ever be reduced to any formula because it depends entirely upon capital flows.
If capital is pouring into a country, then the currency will rise and its competitiveness will decline in international markets. This will temper unemployment to a modest extent. However, if capital fears the government and is fleeing, as we see in Europe, the unemployment will rise sharply and people are afraid to create businesses of hire people. Hence, rising unemployment with capital outflows will result in higher unemployment than with capital inflows.
So the answer is not a one-for-one relationship. The truth is more complex and it is a multifaceted formula that is beyond all comprehension. It also depends how and why the unemployment is rising. The sharp rise in unemployment had NOTHING to do with the economic decline during the Great Depression – it was the Dust Bowl that forced farmers to become skilled labor. Farm employment from from 41% in 1900 to 3% by 1980. This set the stage for the economic boom postwar.
We face rising unemployment from the PUBLIC sector. This is positive for these people consume wealth and contribute nothing to the national wealth. The shift of employment from PUBLIC to PRIVATE will be extremely bullish long-term. Therefore, rising unemployment at this time will have no appreciable impact on the stock market for (1) we will be reducing the costs of government and (2) we will see capital inflows. When the capital flows change direction after 2015.75, then unemployment will rise from thePRIVATE sector and that will be negative rather than positive.