https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/history/americas-economic-history/is-the-supreme-court-acting-unconstitutional/
The Supreme Court has no Constitutional right or permission to exercise “discretion” to hear a case.
They must hear every case
presented to them for that is dictated by the Constitution and cannot
be circumvented by a statute written by Congress or by its own
rule-making practice.
The Supreme Court receives approximately 7,000-8,000 petitions for a writ of certiorari each
term (year).
The court grants and hears oral arguments in about 80
cases per year in a country of over 300 million. That is outrageous and
this practice denies the people the constitutional guarantee of a
tripartite government
(3 branches) with each branch acting as a check
and balance against the others.
Your constitutional right to be heard is being DENIED.
That right is being circumvented by demanding you go to a district
court judge, then appeal to that circuit court, and then apply to be
heard as one of the 7,000+ petitions when they only accept 80.
Congress reduced the power of the Supreme Court by eliminating the
constitutional status of the court by enabling them to decide to hear
cases at their “discretion,” but that is totally
unconstitutional for no statute can amend the Constitution. Any statute
or rule created by Congress, a political party (e.g. Republicans right
now), etc. cannot circumvent the Constitution – PERIOD!
No comments:
Post a Comment